'Man has a perception that it create new systems for itself, but is more a myth than reality, because whenever it tries to acclaim it's sovereignty over nature, nature has shown 'man' his right place.
The human specie is entering a new phase of civilisation I.e a new system of new times. A system with more technology,more closeness while being spatially far. We need to accept that the system was already existing in time somewhere and it's WE who have found it now. Now we need to understand that every system has its own existing rules evolved with logical experiments of time. Because we are new entrant in system, ours is the turn to change... If we try to change the basic rules of the new system, conflict is bound to occur, which would lead to exploits of both -the system and the new entrant, thus delaying the process of stabilisation, for example- A new Indian bride entering the husband's home. She had a life before but she is one who has to adjust to the new surrounding because the husband's home is a stable system with established rules, now if she refuse to change thus arguing over every new change in her life, conflict occurs leading to break off of marriage.
Now the very obvious question arises- what if the new system has some wrong rules?
But it would be wrong to use 'wrong rules'.because the rules may have stagnated in accordance with new times but those rules were 'right' according to the situations of past clearly demarcated by the fact that the system is standing stable in present times. So with time, those stagnated rules need to altered and there is nothing wrong to change them but it shall happen gradually and not instantly.
Thus the new entrant should first become accepted in the new system by its existing component. Once accepted it has now both the right and more authority to replace the wrong rules and the decision to change would be get the support of some component making the evolution more gradual and less painful. Now the resistance may be dealt with the logical argument- 'I am part of the system.'.
Thus we can conclude by saying that the change is inevitable but 'smart' is the one who use the existing rules as a ladder to new system and 'fool' is the one who try to fight over the every rule and bring conflict in the existing system thus delaying his own process of reaching next systems because every system is just a transition b/w the starting line and death because there exists no zenith point.
The human specie is entering a new phase of civilisation I.e a new system of new times. A system with more technology,more closeness while being spatially far. We need to accept that the system was already existing in time somewhere and it's WE who have found it now. Now we need to understand that every system has its own existing rules evolved with logical experiments of time. Because we are new entrant in system, ours is the turn to change... If we try to change the basic rules of the new system, conflict is bound to occur, which would lead to exploits of both -the system and the new entrant, thus delaying the process of stabilisation, for example- A new Indian bride entering the husband's home. She had a life before but she is one who has to adjust to the new surrounding because the husband's home is a stable system with established rules, now if she refuse to change thus arguing over every new change in her life, conflict occurs leading to break off of marriage.
Now the very obvious question arises- what if the new system has some wrong rules?
But it would be wrong to use 'wrong rules'.because the rules may have stagnated in accordance with new times but those rules were 'right' according to the situations of past clearly demarcated by the fact that the system is standing stable in present times. So with time, those stagnated rules need to altered and there is nothing wrong to change them but it shall happen gradually and not instantly.
Thus the new entrant should first become accepted in the new system by its existing component. Once accepted it has now both the right and more authority to replace the wrong rules and the decision to change would be get the support of some component making the evolution more gradual and less painful. Now the resistance may be dealt with the logical argument- 'I am part of the system.'.
Thus we can conclude by saying that the change is inevitable but 'smart' is the one who use the existing rules as a ladder to new system and 'fool' is the one who try to fight over the every rule and bring conflict in the existing system thus delaying his own process of reaching next systems because every system is just a transition b/w the starting line and death because there exists no zenith point.
And death is just the exit from the process of evolution because evolution of time and space continues forever.
...Schon zindagi...
